Crucial conversations are those where “(1) stakes are high, (2) opinions vary, and (3) emotions run strong” (p. 3). In Delta Zeta, examples of these conversations could include working through roommate issues, talking with a fellow Executive Board officer who has not been fulfilling her responsibilities or holding a planning meeting about your next philanthropy event where the co-chairs wish to go in very different directions.
The authors offer the following suggestions for approaching crucial conversations.
- Start With the Heart – what do you really want for yourself and others in this situation? Knowing and revisiting what you really want is crucial and should affect your behavior.
- Self-Monitor – as Socrates is often quoted, “Know Thyself”. Always be aware of how you are behaving and how that is affecting others. For example, do you often become quiet when presented with crucial conversations? Is your silence causing silence in others?
- Create Mutual Purpose and Respect – be sure to establish that those engaged in the conversation are working towards a common outcome of the dialogue and that you respect those participating in the conversation. Individuals must feel safe and respected to participate.
- Explore Other’s Paths – in other words, be sure to listen. Utilize the active listening skills that you have learned, being sure to mirror their actions and paraphrase what you are hearing for confirmation.
For more suggestions, further details and example conversations, be sure to check out the book.
Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., and Switzler, A. (2002). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high. McGraw-Hill: New York.
No comments:
Post a Comment